A number of requests often show up with the emphasis on "making the game more like real baseball/MLB." Yes, this is a goal, but it isn't the end all for every consideration. There are some common reasons why rule change requests may not be implemented or even discussed:
- Yes, we try to be close to real baseball, but in the end this is still "fantasy baseball" and certain comparisons might not work. We're going to always have a more limited and at times arbitrary distinction between real life and the fantasy game.
- We may have opened a rule change up for discussion in the past with little overall support from the owners who provided comments at that time.
- Implementing some rules may create additional loopholes and different way of doing things. With some exceptions, we'd like things to work the same way in the pre-season to the regular season to the playoffs.
- Implementing some rule changes involve defining a process. That process may be difficult or inconsistent to create - some things like lineup adjustments that can be done as "common sense" or inspection by a single manager, general manager, or team owner for your own team may be hard to codify for 500+ teams.
- Beyond defining processes for rules and site features, we also have to often create/change computer programs to implement the implications of the rule. Or create a web process/presentation. If implementation is extensive or prohibitive, the benefits of the change might not be enough to warrant the work.
BWB may or may not solicit comments on rule changes.
1 comment:
I would welcome a change to more than 4 transaction/free agent adds per week.
If the move is at least somewhat seamless(from a programming perspective), it allows more flexibility for the GM.
Post a Comment